News Details

Mar 18, 2025 .

  By

HR vs. Business Goals: Why Founders and HR Don’t See Eye to Eye

This is HR360, unlocking the doors to the world of HR. This newsletter is meant to give you what matters most: relevant trends, insights, and discussions on the fast-evolving workplaces of the future. Whether you’re in HR, a business leader, or simply someone interested in the heartbeat of workplace dynamics, HR360 is here with reflective thoughts, provocative conversation, and inspiration.

Let’s talk about a classic workplace standoff—HR vs. Founders.

If you’ve ever been in an HR role, you’ve probably faced this tension. Founders push for aggressive business expansion, metrics, and survival. HR is driven by compliance, culture, and individuals. While both groups are interested in making the company thrive, their attitudes tend to get in each other’s way. Business leaders regard HR as a cost center, HR views itself as a business facilitator—yet somehow never quite meet each other halfway.

So, where’s the disconnect? More importantly, how can leadership and HR get on the same page to grow the business sustainably without trading culture and people? Let’s break it down.

Why HR and Founders Clash

Fundamentally, the HR vs. business leadership conflict isn’t personal—it’s a matter of priorities.

Founders and business managers are more interested in revenue growth, getting big fast, and reducing expenses. They are more concerned with short-term business survival and investor pressures and are likely to demand quick hiring without rigorous processes. HR prefers compliance, fair policies, and a structured work place. They are more concerned with engagement, retention, and good hiring than with the mere quick filling of jobs.

This misalignment often leads HR to struggle with gaining leadership sponsorship, and the founders see HR as holding everything back. The founder might wish to hire 20 employees in a month’s time, but HR understands that impulsive hiring means high turnover, culture misalignment, and costs in the long run. Rather than viewed as a collaborator, HR is viewed as an obstacle.

The actual cost? Uncontrolled growth, low retention, burnout of employees, and a hostile work environment.

The Business Cost of a Disconnected HR

Overlooking HR’s contribution to business strategy isn’t only detrimental to employees—it’s detrimental to business. Turnover is costly, resulting in higher recruitment and retraining expenses, depleting company resources. Noncompliance risks exposing the business to legal consequences, litigation, and damage to its reputation. Disengagement of employees results in lower productivity, a dip in revenues in the long run.

Where HR is not accorded its rightful position, it promotes a culture in which employees are viewed as mere figures and not assets. This cultivates discontent, low morale, and ultimately, the exodus of great talent. Without a people-centric strategy, companies might grow quickly but collapse sooner.

The irony? An effectively integrated HR strategy is actually able to enable companies to grow more sustainably through making the right hires, more effective leadership, and a healthy workplace culture.

Bridging the Gap: How HR Can Align with Business Goals

The solution isn’t about HR compromising its core function—it’s about being able to talk business and still be the voice of people.

  1. Shift from Cost Center to Growth Partner – HR must measure its contribution to business success. Use metrics to illustrate how better hiring, designed onboarding, and retention directly generate revenue and productivity.
  2. Be Proactive, Not Reactive – Don’t wait for leadership to approach HR. Get ahead of business needs. If the company is expanding, create hiring plans that balance speed and quality. If attrition is increasing, solve underlying problems before they turn into a crisis.
  3. Educate Leaders on the ROI of People Strategies – Business leaders are number-driven, so present them with the numbers. Emphasize how profitability is fueled by strong leadership, clearly defined policies, and employee engagement. When HR uses business language, leadership will listen.

Alignment does not imply that HR needs to be merely another revenue-generating extension. It implies that business growth and people growth must go together—because one cannot exist without the other.

Final Thoughts

HR and business leadership don’t have to be on opposite sides. When both are aligned with a common vision, businesses can succeed in the long term without losing their people. The secret is to get past the old “HR vs. Business” mentality and create a partnership where HR is not merely policing policies but driving business success.

HR is not a hindrance—it’s the backbone of a company that expands, prospers, and endures in the long term. The earlier companies accept this, the better their employees—and profits—will be.

What do you think? Have you experienced this challenge in your company? Let’s keep the conversation going!